TandraftLinked Helper
Stage08Landing architecture

One coherent path leads from tension to trial.

Every section answers one question, resolves an objection and prepares the next step.

See the evidence

The structure follows the user's decision.

The page does not list features in sequence: it creates recognition, proves the mechanism and then reduces risk.

Primary action
1start a 14-day trial
Narrative sections
11without a feature dump
Demonstrations
4context · mode · fallback · review
Action points
3hero · after mechanism · close

Eleven sections, one argument.

Desktop and mobile keep the same order; composition changes, not the reading logic.

  1. 01

    Hero

    Outcome: personalize every message and keep control. CTA: free trial.

    H1 · PRIMARY
  2. 02

    Trust

    10,000+ businesses and linked external ratings as self-reported proof.

    PROOF
  3. 03

    Tension

    Manual personalization does not scale; a basic template loses context.

    VOC
  4. 04

    Mechanism

    Profile + your data + adaptive logic + review.

    CORE
  5. 05

    Two modes

    AI sequence for variation; template for predictability.

    CHOICE
  6. 06

    Context

    Required / If available / Don't use, enrichment and CSV.

    PILLAR 01
  7. 07

    Missing data

    IF–THEN–ELSE and a complete fallback in one example.

    PILLAR 02
  8. 08

    Review

    Edit and approve drafts before sending.

    PILLAR 03
  9. 09

    Use cases

    Sales, recruiting and founders through different context, not different products.

    RELEVANCE
  10. 10

    FAQ

    Variables, missing data, AI review, trial and LinkedIn limits.

    LONG-TAIL
  11. 11

    Final CTA

    Restate the outcome and make the first step reversible.

    CONVERSION

Resolve each objection where it appears.

The FAQ should not collect questions the main narrative already owes an answer to.

01After tensionThis will take just as longMechanism

Show automated context assembly.

Profile, enrichment and approved fields replace manual research for every prospect.

Section
04–06
Proof
PRODUCT-01
02After AIThe message may be inaccurateReview

Show the draft before send.

Review and approval appear immediately after generation, not at the end of the page.

Section
08
Proof
AI Drafts
03After depthThis looks too complex4 steps

Reduce the system to a clear path.

Choose context → create → set fallback → review.

Section
04
Validation
Comprehension without instructions.
04Before CTAWhat happens after the clickPLG

Explain the trial without a trap.

14 days, no card and no automatic charge; activation is campaign launch.

Section
Hero + Final CTA
Proof
GTM-01 · GTM-03

A narrow screen preserves question-to-answer context.

Components do not shrink wholesale or fall into horizontal scrolling.

ComponentDesktopMobileRule
Hero3 semantic zonesOne columnCTA remains obvious
Mechanism4 steps acrossVertical sequenceOrder remains
Mode comparison2 columns2 sequential blocksNo tiny table
FAQFull-width rowsAnswer inside rowOne open at a time
Question → proof → reduced risk → action

The architecture is already the argument.

The sequence keeps the page from becoming a feature catalog: each section answers the question created by the previous one.

Recognition first. Mechanism next. Trial after proof.

Stage 09 turned this architecture into section-level English copy.

Sources and limits.

The architecture is based on current strategy and public evidence. Its order needs comprehension testing with real users.

Every factual input remains traceable.

MESSAGE-01 Message HouseSEO-01 Intent mapGTM-01 Linked Helper trialMETHOD-01 SaaS landing checklist (Supplied material)